<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:09.622179+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</id>
    <title>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823202+00:00</updated>
    <content>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15709</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-15709</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823377+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-15709</content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15709"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39723</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39723</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823413+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39723"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39723</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-39723</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823472+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling</p>
<p>If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn't update the stream-&gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&gt;write_iter().</p>
<p>LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&gt;transferred -
but this only works if we've set any of them.</p>
<p>Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.</p>
<p>This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:</p>
<p>CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28</p>
<p>followed by:</p>
<p>BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39723"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6r55-jr8w-3x3r</id>
    <title>GHSA-6r55-jr8w-3x3r</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823603+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling</p>
<p>If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn't update the stream-&gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&gt;write_iter().</p>
<p>LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&gt;transferred -
but this only works if we've set any of them.</p>
<p>Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.</p>
<p>This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:</p>
<p>CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28</p>
<p>followed by:</p>
<p>BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6r55-jr8w-3x3r"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2025-20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.823694+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:20994-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.824615+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39723</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39723</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.825462+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 90 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest collector doesn't update the stream-&gt;transferred value and it retains its initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set in wreq-&gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&gt;write_iter(). LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&gt;transferred - but this only works if we've set any of them. Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in stream-&gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the values.  stream-&gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero. This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC. This causes -&gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning wreq-&gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops when it overran.  The kernel log showed:     CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28 followed by:     BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, addres…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39723"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1988 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T19:42:10.825825+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
