<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T23:57:30.164446+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/brew-ansible-cve-2026-49264</id>
    <title>BREW-ansible-CVE-2026-49264 — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:57:31.065918+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Homebrew: ansible</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib's `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:</p>
<p>```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = '{}({});'.format(request.callback, response_body)</p>
<p># Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + '();'
```</p>
<p>The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.</p>
<p>There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization</p>
<p>A safe JSONP imple…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/brew-ansible-cve-2026-49264"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hj66-6f7g-4r5v</id>
    <title>GHSA-hj66-6f7g-4r5v — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:57:31.066120+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: oauthlib</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib's `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:</p>
<p>```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = '{}({});'.format(request.callback, response_body)</p>
<p># Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + '();'
```</p>
<p>The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.</p>
<p>There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization</p>
<p>A safe JSONP imple…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hj66-6f7g-4r5v"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11973-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11973-1 — python313-oauthlib-4.0.0-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:57:31.066263+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>python313-oauthlib-4.0.0-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11973-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-4113</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-4113 — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:57:31.066297+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: oauthlib</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib's `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.</p>
<p>When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:</p>
<p>```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = '{}({});'.format(request.callback, response_body)</p>
<p># Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + '();'
```</p>
<p>The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.</p>
<p>There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization</p>
<p>A safe JSONP imple…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-4113"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
