<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.534218+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90313</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-90313</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.594287+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90313"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90313</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-90313</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.594404+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed</p>
<p>A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a
cgroup bpf prog.</p>
<p>This occurs in the following scenario:
1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode.
2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach
   mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or
   update_effective_progs).
3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode.</p>
<p>The reason is that __cgroup_bpf_attach overwrites pl-&gt;storage with the
new storage prior to attachment completion. When attachment fails
midway, the cleanup path calls bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage) to
free the newly allocated storage, but fails to restore pl-&gt;storage back
to old_storage.</p>
<p>Consequently, the still-active prog1 holds invalid or dangling storage
pointers, leading to an invalid memory access when prog1 executes and
calls bpf_get_local_storage. Additionally, original pl-&gt;flags and
cgrp-&gt;bpf.flags[atype] are left unrestored.</p>
<p>Fix this by saving old_pl_flags, old_storage, and old_flags prior to the
update, and properly restoring all of them in the cleanup path on error.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90313"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-2mrf-g72x-r6vx</id>
    <title>GHSA-2mrf-g72x-r6vx</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.594495+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed</p>
<p>A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a
cgroup bpf prog.</p>
<p>This occurs in the following scenario:
1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode.
2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach
   mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or
   update_effective_progs).
3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode.</p>
<p>The reason is that __cgroup_bpf_attach overwrites pl-&gt;storage with the
new storage prior to attachment completion. When attachment fails
midway, the cleanup path calls bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage) to
free the newly allocated storage, but fails to restore pl-&gt;storage back
to old_storage.</p>
<p>Consequently, the still-active prog1 holds invalid or dangling storage
pointers, leading to an invalid memory access when prog1 executes and
calls bpf_get_local_storage. Additionally, original pl-&gt;flags and
cgrp-&gt;bpf.flags[atype] are left unrestored.</p>
<p>Fix this by saving old_pl_flags, old_storage, and old_flags prior to the
update, and properly restoring all of them in the cleanup path on error.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-2mrf-g72x-r6vx"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-90313</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-90313 — bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.594557+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-90313</content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-90313"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11880-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.594597+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90313</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-90313</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:39:44.595938+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a cgroup bpf prog. This occurs in the following scenario: 1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode. 2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach    mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or    update_effective_progs). 3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode. The reason is that __cgroup_bpf_attach overwrites pl-&gt;storage with the new storage prior to attachment completion. When attachment fails midway, the cleanup path calls bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage) to free the newly allocated storage, but fails to restore pl-&gt;storage back to old_storage. Consequently, the still-active prog1 holds invalid or dangling storage pointers, leading to an invalid memory access when prog1 executes and calls bpf_get_local_storage. Additionally, original pl-&gt;flags and cgrp-&gt;bpf.flags[atype] are left unrestored. Fix this by saving old_pl_flags, old_storage, and old_flags prior to the update, and properly restoring all of them in the cleanup path on error.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90313"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
