<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-07T14:57:02.444971+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98363</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98363</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T14:57:02.447491+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>firmware: arm_scpi: reject DVFS OPP count above MAX_DVFS_OPPS</p>
<p>scpi_dvfs_get_info() already rejected a zero opp_count, but still trusted
any larger value from the SCP firmware. The shared-memory reply only holds
MAX_DVFS_OPPS entries in buf.opps[]; a bigger count over-reads that array
and then sizes the allocated OPP table incorrectly (garbage OPPs / OOB).
The missing upper bound dates back to the original SCPI DVFS support.</p>
<p>Reject zero and out-of-range counts in one check and return -EINVAL.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98363"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-33vh-pc87-q32x</id>
    <title>GHSA-33vh-pc87-q32x</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T14:57:02.447697+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>firmware: arm_scpi: reject DVFS OPP count above MAX_DVFS_OPPS</p>
<p>scpi_dvfs_get_info() already rejected a zero opp_count, but still trusted
any larger value from the SCP firmware. The shared-memory reply only holds
MAX_DVFS_OPPS entries in buf.opps[]; a bigger count over-reads that array
and then sizes the allocated OPP table incorrectly (garbage OPPs / OOB).
The missing upper bound dates back to the original SCPI DVFS support.</p>
<p>Reject zero and out-of-range counts in one check and return -EINVAL.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-33vh-pc87-q32x"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98363</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98363 — firmware: arm_scpi: reject DVFS OPP count above MAX_DVFS_OPPS</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T14:57:02.447743+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-98363</content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98363"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
