<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T11:52:09.319283+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23100</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-23100 — mm/hugetlb: fix hugetlb_pmd_shared()</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T11:52:09.531763+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mm/hugetlb: fix hugetlb_pmd_shared()</p>
<p>Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl.  using
mmu_gather)", v3.</p>
<p>One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related
comment fixes.</p>
<p>I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix,
deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. 
While doing that I identified the other things.</p>
<p>The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly"
easily. At least patch #1 and #4.</p>
<p>Patch #1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing
Patch #2 + #3 are simple comment fixes that patch #4 interacts with.
Patch #4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive
IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit().</p>
<p>The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather.
Read: complicated</p>
<p>There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable
optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series.</p>
<p>Runtime tested, with a focus on fixing the performance regression using
the original reproducer [2] on x86.</p>
<p>This patch (of 4):</p>
<p>We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared
count.  Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding
speculative references) and instead use ptdesc-&gt;pt_share_count to identify
sharing.</p>
<p>We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never
detect a shared PMD table as such, b…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23100"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
