<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T22:37:49.602263+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-42494</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-42494 — buffer overruns in libfsimage iso9660 handling</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T22:37:49.631557+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Xen</p>
<p>[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the
text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]</p>
<p>The directory and Rock Ridge / SUSP walk in libfsimage's iso9660 driver
derives several lengths directly from attacker-controlled on-disk fields
without validating them:</p>
<p>* The directory loop itself assumes a good record length.  This is
   CVE-2026-42494.</p>
<p>* The calculation of the System Use area may underflow.  This is
   CVE-2026-42495.</p>
<p>* The Rock Ridge extension loop assumes a good (inner) record length.
   This is CVE-2026-62423.</p>
<p>* The Rock Ridge NM record processing assumes a good entry length.
   This is CVE-2026-62424.</p>
<p>* The Rock Ridge CE record processing assumes a good size and offset.
   This is CVE-2026-62425.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-42494"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
