<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T11:48:56.006094+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-44681</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-44681 — Authlib: Open Redirect in Authlib OIDC Implicit/Hybrid Authorization</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T11:48:56.730811+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> authlib</p>
<p>Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.12 and 1.7.1, an unauthenticated open redirect in Authlib's OpenIDImplicitGrant and OpenIDHybridGrant authorization endpoint lets a remote attacker cause the authorization server to issue an HTTP 302 to an attacker-chosen URL by submitting an authorization request that omits the openid scope. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.12 and 1.7.1.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-44681"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-r95x-qfjj-fjj2</id>
    <title>GHSA-r95x-qfjj-fjj2 — Authlib OIDC Implicit/Hybrid Authorization Vulnerable to Open Redirect</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T11:48:56.730909+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: authlib</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>An unauthenticated open redirect in Authlib's `OpenIDImplicitGrant` and `OpenIDHybridGrant` authorization endpoint lets a remote attacker cause the authorization server to issue an HTTP 302 to an attacker-chosen URL by submitting an authorization request that omits the `openid` scope.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>#### Vulnerable code</p>
<p>`OpenIDImplicitGrant.validate_authorization_request` in `authlib/oidc/core/grants/implicit.py`:</p>
<p>```python
def validate_authorization_request(self):
    if not is_openid_scope(self.request.payload.scope):
        raise InvalidScopeError(
            "Missing 'openid' scope",
            redirect_uri=self.request.payload.redirect_uri,  # ← raw, unvalidated
            redirect_fragment=True,
        )
    redirect_uri = super().validate_authorization_request()
    ...
```</p>
<p>`OpenIDHybridGrant.validate_authorization_request` in `authlib/oidc/core/grants/hybrid.py` shares the same pattern.</p>
<p>#### Root cause</p>
<p>Both methods perform the `openid` scope presence check before delegating to `super().validate_authorization_request()`, which is where `AuthorizationEndpointMixin.validate_authorization_redirect_uri` validates the requested `redirect_uri` against the client's `check_redirect_uri(...)`. The `InvalidScopeError` thrown by the scope check therefore carries attacker-controlled `self.request.payload.redirect_uri`.</p>
<p>`OAuth2Error.__call__` in `authlib/oauth2/base.py` renders any error with a non-empty `redirect_uri` as an HTTP 302:</p>
<p>```python
def __call__…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-r95x-qfjj-fjj2"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
