<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T08:23:05.931637+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21722</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-21722 — nilfs2: do not force clear folio if buffer is referenced</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T08:23:05.935738+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>nilfs2: do not force clear folio if buffer is referenced</p>
<p>Patch series "nilfs2: protect busy buffer heads from being force-cleared".</p>
<p>This series fixes the buffer head state inconsistency issues reported by
syzbot that occurs when the filesystem is corrupted and falls back to
read-only, and the associated buffer head use-after-free issue.</p>
<p>This patch (of 2):</p>
<p>Syzbot has reported that after nilfs2 detects filesystem corruption and
falls back to read-only, inconsistencies in the buffer state may occur.</p>
<p>One of the inconsistencies is that when nilfs2 calls mark_buffer_dirty()
to set a data or metadata buffer as dirty, but it detects that the buffer
is not in the uptodate state:</p>
<p>WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6049 at fs/buffer.c:1177 mark_buffer_dirty+0x2e5/0x520
  fs/buffer.c:1177
 ...
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  nilfs_palloc_commit_alloc_entry+0x4b/0x160 fs/nilfs2/alloc.c:598
  nilfs_ifile_create_inode+0x1dd/0x3a0 fs/nilfs2/ifile.c:73
  nilfs_new_inode+0x254/0x830 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:344
  nilfs_mkdir+0x10d/0x340 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:218
  vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
  do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
  __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline]
  __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline]
  __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293
  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f</p>
<p>The other is when nilfs_btre…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21722"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
