<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T22:38:03.042399+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37741</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-37741 — jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T22:38:03.046042+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode</p>
<p>syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1]</p>
<p>When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4,
which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the
mounted loop device to be invalidated.</p>
<p>When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(),
read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the
metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be
assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately
causes a deadlock when entering diFree().</p>
<p>To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode.</p>
<p>[1]
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888044548920 (&amp;(imap-&gt;im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889</p>
<p>but task is already holding lock:
ffff888044548920 (&amp;(imap-&gt;im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630</p>
<p>other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:</p>
<p>CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;(imap-&gt;im_aglock[index]));
  lock(&amp;(imap-&gt;im_aglock[index]));</p>
<p>*** DEADLOCK ***</p>
<p>May be due to missing lock nesting notation</p>
<p>5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309:
 #0: ffff888…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37741"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
