<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T19:42:20.199508+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38163</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-38163 — f2fs: fix to do sanity check on sbi-&gt;total_valid_block_count</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T19:42:20.204045+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>f2fs: fix to do sanity check on sbi-&gt;total_valid_block_count</p>
<p>syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below:</p>
<p>------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521!
RIP: 0010:dec_valid_block_count+0x3b2/0x3c0 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521
Call Trace:
 f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0xc8c/0x11a0 fs/f2fs/file.c:695
 truncate_dnode+0x417/0x740 fs/f2fs/node.c:973
 truncate_nodes+0x3ec/0xf50 fs/f2fs/node.c:1014
 f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks+0x8e3/0x1370 fs/f2fs/node.c:1197
 f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x840/0x12b0 fs/f2fs/file.c:810
 f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10d/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:838
 f2fs_truncate+0x417/0x720 fs/f2fs/file.c:888
 f2fs_setattr+0xc4f/0x12f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1112
 notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:552
 do_truncate+0x222/0x310 fs/open.c:65
 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3466 [inline]
 do_open fs/namei.c:3849 [inline]
 path_openat+0x2e4f/0x35d0 fs/namei.c:4004
 do_filp_open+0x284/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4031
 do_sys_openat2+0x12b/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1429
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline]
 __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1522 [inline]
 __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1516 [inline]
 __x64_sys_creat+0x124/0x170 fs/open.c:1516
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94</p>
<p>The reason is: in fuzzed image, sbi-&gt;total_valid_block_count is
inconsistent w/ mapped blocks indexed by inode, so, we should
not trigger panic for such case, instead, let's print log and
set fsck fla…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38163"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
