<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T12:40:09.815022+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23200</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-23200 — ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T12:40:09.830099+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF</p>
<p>syzbot reported a kernel BUG in fib6_add_rt2node() when adding an IPv6
route. [0]</p>
<p>Commit f72514b3c569 ("ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static
route") introduced logic to clear RTF_ADDRCONF from existing routes
when a static route with the same nexthop is added. However, this
causes a problem when the existing route has a gateway.</p>
<p>When RTF_ADDRCONF is cleared from a route that has a gateway, that
route becomes eligible for ECMP, i.e. rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns
true. The issue is that this route was never added to the
fib6_siblings list.</p>
<p>This leads to a mismatch between the following counts:</p>
<p>- The sibling count computed by iterating fib6_next chain, which
  includes the newly ECMP-eligible route</p>
<p>- The actual siblings in fib6_siblings list, which does not include
  that route</p>
<p>When a subsequent ECMP route is added, fib6_add_rt2node() hits
BUG_ON(sibling-&gt;fib6_nsiblings != rt-&gt;fib6_nsiblings) because the
counts don't match.</p>
<p>Fix this by only clearing RTF_ADDRCONF when the existing route does
not have a gateway. Routes without a gateway cannot qualify for ECMP
anyway (rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() requires fib_nh_gw_family), so clearing
RTF_ADDRCONF on them is safe and matches the original intent of the
commit.</p>
<p>[0]:
kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1217!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6010 Comm: syz.0.17 No…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23200"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
