<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T05:26:56.365308+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53050</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-53050 — quota: Fix race of dquot_scan_active() with quota deactivation</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T05:26:56.367381+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>quota: Fix race of dquot_scan_active() with quota deactivation</p>
<p>dquot_scan_active() can race with quota deactivation in
quota_release_workfn() like:</p>
<p>CPU0 (quota_release_workfn)         CPU1 (dquot_scan_active)
  ==============================      ==============================
  spin_lock(&amp;dq_list_lock);
  list_replace_init(
    &amp;releasing_dquots, &amp;rls_head);
    /* dquot X on rls_head,
       dq_count == 0,
       DQ_ACTIVE_B still set */
  spin_unlock(&amp;dq_list_lock);
  synchronize_srcu(&amp;dquot_srcu);
                                      spin_lock(&amp;dq_list_lock);
                                      list_for_each_entry(dquot,
                                          &amp;inuse_list, dq_inuse) {
                                        /* finds dquot X */
                                        dquot_active(X) -&gt; true
                                        atomic_inc(&amp;X-&gt;dq_count);
                                      }
                                      spin_unlock(&amp;dq_list_lock);
  spin_lock(&amp;dq_list_lock);
  dquot = list_first_entry(&amp;rls_head);
  WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&amp;dquot-&gt;dq_count));</p>
<p>The problem is not only a cosmetic one as under memory pressure the
caller of dquot_scan_active() can end up working on freed dquot.</p>
<p>Fix the problem by making sure the dquot is removed from releasing list
when we acquire a reference to it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53050"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
