<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T20:49:10.178800+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53368</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-53368 — f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T20:49:10.180010+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage</p>
<p>f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:</p>
<p>create &amp; write &amp; fsync 'file A'                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set</p>
<p>The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&gt;node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.</p>
<p>This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_n…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53368"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
