<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T14:15:25.616655+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93241</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-93241 — memcg: bypass the reclaim and oom killer for dying tasks once oom_reaper is done</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T14:15:25.617726+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>memcg: bypass the reclaim and oom killer for dying tasks once oom_reaper is done</p>
<p>At Meta, we are seeing instances where an OOM killed job is stuck in the
exit path for several hours.  In one particular case, the job was stuck
for more than 8 hours and I had to manually remove the memory.max limits
to allow the process to exit.</p>
<p>The job was a single process job and had ~55 GiB memory.max and zswap
enabled.  It had almost 0 anon in memory and ~111 GiB in zswap compressed
to ~51 GiB zswap pool (i.e.  almost all of memory.current was zswap). 
Nothing was left on the LRUs to reclaim.</p>
<p>On further inspection, I observed ~20k threads of that process stuck with
the following stack:</p>
<p>[&lt;0&gt;] mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x4e/0xa0
[&lt;0&gt;] charge_memcg+0x8bf/0x990
[&lt;0&gt;] mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio+0x4e/0x80
[&lt;0&gt;] __read_swap_cache_async+0x10c/0x260
[&lt;0&gt;] swapin_readahead+0x116/0x3f0
[&lt;0&gt;] do_swap_page+0x13c/0x1ce0
[&lt;0&gt;] handle_mm_fault+0x61d/0x11f0
[&lt;0&gt;] do_user_addr_fault+0x3e7/0x6d0
[&lt;0&gt;] exc_page_fault+0x8f/0x110
[&lt;0&gt;] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[&lt;0&gt;] __get_user_8+0x14/0x20
[&lt;0&gt;] futex_cleanup+0x27/0x1c0
[&lt;0&gt;] futex_exit_release+0x47/0x60
[&lt;0&gt;] do_exit+0x107/0x940
[&lt;0&gt;] do_group_exit+0x81/0xa0
[&lt;0&gt;] get_signal+0x2b1/0x6e0
[&lt;0&gt;] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x1a/0x1c0
[&lt;0&gt;] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xa8/0x1c0
[&lt;0&gt;] do_syscall_64+0x152/0x250
[&lt;0&gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53</p>
<p>In addition the dmesg was filled wit…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93241"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
