<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T07:25:08.150396+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-33752</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-33752 — Redirect-based SSRF leading to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T07:25:08.156221+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> lexiforest curl_cffi</p>
<p>curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-33752"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp</id>
    <title>GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp — curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T07:25:08.156330+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: curl_cffi</p>
<p>### Summary
curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.</p>
<p>Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.</p>
<p>### Details
The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests
- User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
- Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
- There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.</p>
<p>This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can
- Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
- Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
- Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically</p>
<p>As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.</p>
<p>Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block</p>
<p>This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-2431</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2431 — curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T07:25:08.156421+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: curl-cffi</p>
<p>### Summary
curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.</p>
<p>Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.</p>
<p>### Details
The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests
- User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
- Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
- There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.</p>
<p>This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can
- Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
- Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
- Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically</p>
<p>As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.</p>
<p>Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block</p>
<p>This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-2431"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
