<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T10:41:21.452286+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-32028</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-32028 — OpenClaw &lt; 2026.2.25 - Missing Authorization Check in Discord DM Reaction Ingress</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T10:41:21.824866+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> OpenClaw</p>
<p>OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 fail to enforce dmPolicy and allowFrom authorization checks on Discord direct-message reaction notifications, allowing non-allowlisted users to enqueue reaction-derived system events. Attackers can exploit this inconsistency by reacting to bot-authored DM messages to bypass DM authorization restrictions and trigger downstream automation or tool policies.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-32028"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-354r-7mfh-7rh2</id>
    <title>GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2 — OpenClaw: Discord DM reaction ingress missed dmPolicy/allowFrom checks in restricted setups</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T10:41:21.825157+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: openclaw</p>
<p>### Summary
In OpenClaw `&lt;= 2026.2.24`, Discord direct-message reaction notifications did not consistently apply the same DM authorization checks (`dmPolicy` / `allowFrom`) that are enforced for normal DM message ingress.</p>
<p>In restrictive DM setups, a non-allowlisted Discord user who can react to a bot-authored DM message could still enqueue a reaction-derived system event in the session.</p>
<p>This is a reaction-only ingress inconsistency. By itself it does not directly execute commands; practical impact depends on downstream automation/tool policy.</p>
<p>### Details
The DM message path already enforces `dmPolicy`/`allowFrom` authorization, but the DM reaction-notification path previously allowed event enqueue under reaction mode checks without that same authorization gate.</p>
<p>Fix in `main` aligns reaction ingress with normal message preflight for Discord DM/group-DM/guild policy boundaries and applies equivalent DM reaction authorization hardening for Slack to keep channel behavior consistent.</p>
<p>### Affected Packages / Versions
- `npm` package: `openclaw`
- Affected: `&lt;= 2026.2.24`
- Patched: `&gt;= 2026.2.25`</p>
<p>### Fix Commit(s)
- `aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e`</p>
<p>### Release Process Note
`patched_versions` is pre-set to the release (`2026.2.25`) so after npm release the advisory is published.</p>
<p>Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-354r-7mfh-7rh2"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
