<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T15:47:02.144687+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-48522</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-48522 — PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T15:47:02.147623+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> jpadilla pyjwt</p>
<p>PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.13.0, PyJWKClient passes its uri argument directly to urllib.request.urlopen() which uses Python stdlib's default OpenerDirector registering HTTPHandler, HTTPSHandler, FTPHandler, FileHandler, and DataHandler. There is currently no documented option to restrict which schemes PyJWKClient will fetch. If an application's jku URL ingestion path accepts attacker-influenced URLs (e.g., from JWT header, configuration file, OAuth flow parameter), the attacker can cause PyJWKClient to read arbitrary local files via file:// (SSRF on local filesystem), cause PyJWKClient to attempt FTP / data-URI fetches (broader SSRF surface), or forge tokens that PyJWT verifies as valid. The library does not directly return non-HTTP(S) URI contents to the attacker; the chained "plant a JWKS to forge tokens" scenario described in the original report requires additional application-layer flaws (attacker write access to a filesystem path, untrusted jku derivation) that this fix does not address. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-48522"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-993g-76c3-p5m4</id>
    <title>GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4 — PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables CVE-2024-21643-class SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: sche…</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T15:47:02.147730+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: PyJWT</p>
<p>&gt; [!NOTE]
&gt; The library does not directly return non-HTTP(S) URI contents to the attacker; the chained "plant a JWKS to forge tokens" scenario described in the original report requires additional application-layer flaws (attacker write access to a filesystem path, untrusted jku derivation) that this fix does not address. Severity is scored for the scheme-acceptance bug in isolation.</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>PyJWKClient passes its `uri` argument directly to `urllib.request.urlopen()` which uses Python stdlib's default `OpenerDirector` registering `HTTPHandler`, `HTTPSHandler`, `FTPHandler`, **`FileHandler`**, and `DataHandler`. There is currently no documented option to restrict which schemes PyJWKClient will fetch.</p>
<p>If an application's `jku` URL ingestion path accepts attacker-influenced URLs (e.g., from JWT header, configuration file, OAuth flow parameter), the attacker can:</p>
<p>1. Cause PyJWKClient to read arbitrary local files via `file://` (SSRF on local filesystem) — the file's contents are passed to `json.load`.
2. Cause PyJWKClient to attempt FTP / data-URI fetches (broader SSRF surface).
3. **Forge tokens that PyJWT verifies as valid** — if the attacker can write to any path the JKU URL points at AND influences the URL, they can plant a JWK Set containing their own public key, sign tokens with the matching private key, and `jwt.decode()` accepts.</p>
<p>## Affected versions</p>
<p>Tested and reproducible on **PyJWT 2.11.0 and 2.12.1**. Likely all versions back to PyJWKClient introduction.</p>
<p>##…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-993g-76c3-p5m4"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-175</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-175</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T15:47:02.147840+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: pyjwt</p>
<p>PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.13.0, PyJWKClient passes its uri argument directly to urllib.request.urlopen() which uses Python stdlib's default OpenerDirector registering HTTPHandler, HTTPSHandler, FTPHandler, FileHandler, and DataHandler. There is currently no documented option to restrict which schemes PyJWKClient will fetch. If an application's jku URL ingestion path accepts attacker-influenced URLs (e.g., from JWT header, configuration file, OAuth flow parameter), the attacker can cause PyJWKClient to read arbitrary local files via file:// (SSRF on local filesystem), cause PyJWKClient to attempt FTP / data-URI fetches (broader SSRF surface), or forge tokens that PyJWT verifies as valid. The library does not directly return non-HTTP(S) URI contents to the attacker; the chained "plant a JWKS to forge tokens" scenario described in the original report requires additional application-layer flaws (attacker write access to a filesystem path, untrusted jku derivation) that this fix does not address. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-175"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
