<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T12:49:37.139275+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x445-f3h2-j279</id>
    <title>GHSA-x445-f3h2-j279 — Auth.js: OAuth state, nonce, and PKCE check cookies are not bound to the provider that created them</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T12:49:37.142860+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: @auth/core, npm: next-auth</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Auth.js stores the OAuth/OIDC anti-CSRF checks (`state`, `nonce`, and the PKCE verifier) in global cookies that are not bound to the provider that created them. On callback, a check value minted during a sign-in started with one provider can satisfy the callback for a different provider, because the stored cookie is not verified against the callback provider's identity (provider id, issuer, client id, or redirect URI). In a multi-provider app that allows account linking while logged in, this provider-confusion / mix-up condition can let an attacker link their account at a second provider to a victim's user.</p>
<p>## Am I affected?</p>
<p>You may be affected if **all** of the following hold:</p>
<p>- You use `next-auth` `&lt;= 4.24.14` or `&gt;= 5.0.0-beta.1, &lt;= 5.0.0-beta.31`, or `@auth/core` `&lt;= 0.41.2`.
- You configure multiple OAuth/OIDC providers.
- You allow users to link additional providers while logged in.
- At least one configured provider's authorization request is observable by an attacker, and at least one target provider's callback can be satisfied without a PKCE verifier (i.e. it relies only on `state` or only on `nonce`).</p>
<p>You are **not** affected if you use a single OAuth provider, do not allow logged-in account linking, or all providers enforce PKCE.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>- Account-linking confusion: an attacker can get their account at a target provider linked to the victim's Auth.js user, granting the attacker persistent sign-in to the victim's account through that linked prov…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x445-f3h2-j279"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
