<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T23:26:44.297158+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97620</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-97620</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T23:26:44.522761+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>drm/xe: Flush LSC untyped L1 dataport cache after rcs/ccs batches</p>
<p>emit_render_cache_flush() sets PIPE_CONTROL0_HDC_PIPELINE_FLUSH to
flush the L2/HDC data cache before fence signalling, but it never
requests a flush of the LSC untyped L1 data cache via the 'Untyped
Data-Port Cache Flush Enable' bit in PIPE_CONTROL DWord0[11].</p>
<p>Per the Bspec, in 3D pipeline mode HDC Pipeline Flush is documented to
also flush/invalidate the untyped L1 cache, but only depending on how
HDC_CHICKEN0[13:11] is programmed. Starting with MTL, this coupling
between HDC Pipeline Flush and the untyped L1 cache flush no longer
holds in practice, regardless of how HDC_CHICKEN0 is programmed, so
relying on it is not safe on newer platforms such as BMG. Mesa's Vulkan
driver (anv) has been assuming the kernel flushes both caches between
submissions, and hit user-visible corruption in apps such as Llama.cpp
because of this gap; it now works around it by flushing both caches
again from userspace at the end of every command buffer.</p>
<p>Correctness between submissions on the same queue is userspace's
responsibility and belongs in Mesa, not the kernel. However, for
security we must ensure stale data can't leak through the untyped L1
dataport cache once memory is reclaimed or evicted, which requires the
KMD to flush it before releasing memory for reuse.</p>
<p>Prior to MTL, HDC_CHICKEN0 could be programmed (as already done for
DG2 via Wa_22010960976/Wa_…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97620"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-27vj-fv42-fgqc</id>
    <title>GHSA-27vj-fv42-fgqc</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T23:26:44.522902+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>drm/xe: Flush LSC untyped L1 dataport cache after rcs/ccs batches</p>
<p>emit_render_cache_flush() sets PIPE_CONTROL0_HDC_PIPELINE_FLUSH to
flush the L2/HDC data cache before fence signalling, but it never
requests a flush of the LSC untyped L1 data cache via the 'Untyped
Data-Port Cache Flush Enable' bit in PIPE_CONTROL DWord0[11].</p>
<p>Per the Bspec, in 3D pipeline mode HDC Pipeline Flush is documented to
also flush/invalidate the untyped L1 cache, but only depending on how
HDC_CHICKEN0[13:11] is programmed. Starting with MTL, this coupling
between HDC Pipeline Flush and the untyped L1 cache flush no longer
holds in practice, regardless of how HDC_CHICKEN0 is programmed, so
relying on it is not safe on newer platforms such as BMG. Mesa's Vulkan
driver (anv) has been assuming the kernel flushes both caches between
submissions, and hit user-visible corruption in apps such as Llama.cpp
because of this gap; it now works around it by flushing both caches
again from userspace at the end of every command buffer.</p>
<p>Correctness between submissions on the same queue is userspace's
responsibility and belongs in Mesa, not the kernel. However, for
security we must ensure stale data can't leak through the untyped L1
dataport cache once memory is reclaimed or evicted, which requires the
KMD to flush it before releasing memory for reuse.</p>
<p>Prior to MTL, HDC_CHICKEN0 could be programmed (as already done for
DG2 via Wa_22010960976/Wa_…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-27vj-fv42-fgqc"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97620</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97620</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T23:26:44.522959+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: Flush LSC untyped L1 dataport cache after rcs/ccs batches emit_render_cache_flush() sets PIPE_CONTROL0_HDC_PIPELINE_FLUSH to flush the L2/HDC data cache before fence signalling, but it never requests a flush of the LSC untyped L1 data cache via the 'Untyped Data-Port Cache Flush Enable' bit in PIPE_CONTROL DWord0[11]. Per the Bspec, in 3D pipeline mode HDC Pipeline Flush is documented to also flush/invalidate the untyped L1 cache, but only depending on how HDC_CHICKEN0[13:11] is programmed. Starting with MTL, this coupling between HDC Pipeline Flush and the untyped L1 cache flush no longer holds in practice, regardless of how HDC_CHICKEN0 is programmed, so relying on it is not safe on newer platforms such as BMG. Mesa's Vulkan driver (anv) has been assuming the kernel flushes both caches between submissions, and hit user-visible corruption in apps such as Llama.cpp because of this gap; it now works around it by flushing both caches again from userspace at the end of every command buffer. Correctness between submissions on the same queue is userspace's responsibility and belongs in Mesa, not the kernel. However, for security we must ensure stale data can't leak through the untyped L1 dataport cache once memory is reclaimed or evicted, which requires the KMD to flush it before releasing memory for reuse. Prior to MTL, HDC_CHICKEN0 could be programmed (as already done for DG2 via Wa_22010960976/Wa_14013…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97620"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3579 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T23:26:44.523525+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
