<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T16:54:04.267967+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97435</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-97435 — net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T16:54:04.270443+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect</p>
<p>dsa_port_from_netdev() may return a valid port from a different switch
chip. Programming another chip's port index into the local hardware
causes redirection to the wrong port, or an out-of-bounds access if the
index exceeds the local chip's port count.</p>
<p>Apply a minimal fix that adds a check to catch this case and adjusts the
extack message. When cls-&gt;common.skip_sw is not set, the operation could
instead redirect to the upstream port and let the software or upstream
switch(es) handle the forward, but that is not addressed here.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97435"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
