<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559</link>
      <description>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-11974</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-11974</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-11974</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-11974</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-37821</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37821</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37821</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-37821</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37821</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a
sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a
delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed.
In that case:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of
   dequeue_entities(), slice is set to
   cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then
   it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX.
2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity.
3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration
   tries to dequeue the parent.
4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the
   first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_.
5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to
   the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic
results. A manifestation we saw in production was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which
   ends up as a huge negative number.
7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit
   is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge
   negative number.
8. In place_entity(),…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a
sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a
delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed.
In that case:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of
   dequeue_entities(), slice is set to
   cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then
   it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX.
2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity.
3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration
   tries to dequeue the parent.
4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the
   first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_.
5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to
   the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic
results. A manifestation we saw in production was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which
   ends up as a huge negative number.
7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit
   is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge
   negative number.
8. In place_entity(),…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37821</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jq2v-j4fw-m4mg</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jq2v-j4fw-m4mg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a
sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a
delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed.
In that case:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of
   dequeue_entities(), slice is set to
   cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then
   it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX.
2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity.
3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration
   tries to dequeue the parent.
4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the
   first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_.
5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to
   the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic
results. A manifestation we saw in production was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which
   ends up as a huge negative number.
7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit
   is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge
   negative number.
8. In place_entity(),…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a
sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a
delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed.
In that case:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of
   dequeue_entities(), slice is set to
   cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then
   it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX.
2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity.
3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration
   tries to dequeue the parent.
4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the
   first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_.
5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to
   the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic
results. A manifestation we saw in production was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which
   ends up as a huge negative number.
7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit
   is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge
   negative number.
8. In place_entity(),…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jq2v-j4fw-m4mg</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025-20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:20994-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-37821</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37821</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 73 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash. The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed. In that case: 1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of    dequeue_entities(), slice is set to    cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then    it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX. 2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity. 3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration    tries to dequeue the parent. 4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the    first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_. 5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to    the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX. This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic results. A manifestation we saw in production was: 6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which    ends up as a huge negative number. 7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit    is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge    negative number. 8. In place_entity(), se-&amp;gt;vl…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 73 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/eevdf: Fix se-&amp;gt;slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash. The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a delayed group entity, and then the entity&amp;#39;s parent&amp;#39;s dequeue is delayed. In that case: 1. In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of    dequeue_entities(), slice is set to    cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then    it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX. 2. The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity. 3. If the entity was its parent&amp;#39;s only child, then the next iteration    tries to dequeue the parent. 4. If the parent&amp;#39;s dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the    first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_. 5. The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;slice to    the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX. This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic results. A manifestation we saw in production was: 6. In update_entity_lag(), se-&amp;gt;slice is used to calculate limit, which    ends up as a huge negative number. 7. limit is used in se-&amp;gt;vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit    is negative, vlag &amp;gt; limit, so se-&amp;gt;vlag is set to the same huge    negative number. 8. In place_entity(), se-&amp;gt;vl…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37821</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0975 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0975</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
