<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</link>
      <description>CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15709</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15709</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15709</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bdu:2025-15709</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39723</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39723</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39723</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-39723</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39723</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred -
but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;followed by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred -
but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;followed by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39723</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6r55-jr8w-3x3r</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6r55-jr8w-3x3r</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred -
but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;followed by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred -
but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning
wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran.  The kernel log showed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;followed by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6r55-jr8w-3x3r</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025-20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2025-20081-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:20994-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/suse-su-2025:20994-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39723</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39723</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 90 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter(). LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred - but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them. Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero. This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC. This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops when it overran.  The kernel log showed:     CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28 followed by:     BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, addres…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 90 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest collector doesn&amp;#39;t update the stream-&amp;gt;transferred value and it retains its initial LONG_MAX value.  Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set in wreq-&amp;gt;transferred - which is then returned from -&amp;gt;write_iter(). LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-&amp;gt;transferred - but this only works if we&amp;#39;ve set any of them. Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in stream-&amp;gt;transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the values.  stream-&amp;gt;transferred can then be initialised to zero. This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with cache=none.  It splices data to the target file.  Once (if) it has used up all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC. This causes -&amp;gt;write_iter() to fail.  However, it was returning wreq-&amp;gt;transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops when it overran.  The kernel log showed:     CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28 followed by:     BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, addres…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39723</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1988 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
