<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 09:07:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-46434</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46434</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, a user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding any one of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one. Version 2.6 fixes the issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, a user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding any one of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one. Version 2.6 fixes the issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46434</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-x249-cx55-2h87 — wger: Trainer Privilege Escalation - Improper Privilege Management</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x249-cx55-2h87</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: wger&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding **any one** of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`UserDeactivateView` (file: `wger/core/views/user.py`, line 378) is configured with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
permission_required = (&amp;#39;gym.manage_gym&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;gym.manage_gyms&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;gym.gym_trainer&amp;#39;)
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin` (file: `wger/utils/generic_views.py`, line 48) treats this tuple as an OR check -- any single permission is sufficient:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
class WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin(PermissionRequiredMixin):
    def has_permission(self):
        for permission in self.get_permission_required():
            if self.request.user.has_perm(permission):
                return True      # &amp;lt;-- ANY one permission is enough
        return False
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `dispatch()` method only verifies same-gym membership:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
    edit_user = get_object_or_404(User, pk=self.kwargs[&amp;#39;pk&amp;#39;])
    if (
        request.user.has_perm(&amp;#39;gym.manage_gym&amp;#39;)
        or request.user.has_perm(&amp;#39;gym.gym_trainer&amp;#39;)
    ) and edit_user.userprofile.gym_id != request.user.userprofile.gym_id:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: wger&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding **any one** of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`UserDeactivateView` (file: `wger/core/views/user.py`, line 378) is configured with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
permission_required = (&amp;#39;gym.manage_gym&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;gym.manage_gyms&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;gym.gym_trainer&amp;#39;)
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin` (file: `wger/utils/generic_views.py`, line 48) treats this tuple as an OR check -- any single permission is sufficient:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
class WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin(PermissionRequiredMixin):
    def has_permission(self):
        for permission in self.get_permission_required():
            if self.request.user.has_perm(permission):
                return True      # &amp;lt;-- ANY one permission is enough
        return False
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `dispatch()` method only verifies same-gym membership:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
    edit_user = get_object_or_404(User, pk=self.kwargs[&amp;#39;pk&amp;#39;])
    if (
        request.user.has_perm(&amp;#39;gym.manage_gym&amp;#39;)
        or request.user.has_perm(&amp;#39;gym.gym_trainer&amp;#39;)
    ) and edit_user.userprofile.gym_id != request.user.userprofile.gym_id:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x249-cx55-2h87</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
