<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 23:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BREW-ansible-CVE-2026-49264 — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/brew-ansible-cve-2026-49264</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: ansible&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: ansible&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/brew-ansible-cve-2026-49264</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-hj66-6f7g-4r5v — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hj66-6f7g-4r5v</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: oauthlib&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: oauthlib&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-hj66-6f7g-4r5v</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11973-1 — python313-oauthlib-4.0.0-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11973-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;python313-oauthlib-4.0.0-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;python313-oauthlib-4.0.0-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11973-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-4113 — Oauthlib : Unsafe JSONP callback injection in RevocationEndpoint allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-4113</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: oauthlib&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: oauthlib&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True`, oauthlib&amp;#39;s `RevocationEndpoint` reflects the user-supplied `callback` parameter directly into JavaScript response bodies on both success and error paths without validating that it is a legal JSONP callback name. This allows arbitrary JavaScript response generation instead of a restricted function call, making the documented JSONP revocation feature unsafe for browser-based JSONP consumption when attackers can influence `callback`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is in `oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/revocation.py`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When `enable_jsonp=True` is passed to the `RevocationEndpoint` constructor, two code paths wrap the response body using the user-supplied `request.callback` parameter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Error response path (line 72-73):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = &amp;#39;{}({});&amp;#39;.format(request.callback, response_body)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# Success response path (line 81-82):
if self.enable_jsonp and request.callback:
    response_body = request.callback + &amp;#39;();&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `request.callback` value comes from HTTP request parameters, either the query string or POST body, via the `Request` class in `oauthlib/common.py` (lines 394-395), which merges query and body parameters into `_params`. Any value the client sends as `callback` is used verbatim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no validation of any kind on the callback parameter:
- No check that it is a valid JavaScript identifier
- No whitelist of allowed characters
- No escaping or sanitization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A safe JSONP imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-4113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
