https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:01:16 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-59230 <p>Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel.</p> <p>This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.</p> <p>The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier ha…</p> <p>Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel.</p> <p>This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.</p> <p>The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier ha…</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-59230 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cx47-qxp5-mmh2 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: org.apache.camel:camel-mail</p> <p>Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel.</p> <p>This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.</p> <p>The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier harden…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: org.apache.camel:camel-mail</p> <p>Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel.</p> <p>This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.</p> <p>The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier harden…</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cx47-qxp5-mmh2 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/rhsa-2026:71675 <p>jetty-security: Eclipse Jetty: Authentication bypass via Digest authentication encoding collision jetty: Eclipse Jetty: Information disclosure due to retained HTTP/1.1 trailers across connections org.bouncycastle/bc-java: org.bouncycastle/bc-lts-java: Bouncy Castle for Java: Cryptographic signature bypass in RSA PKCS#1 verification vertx-core: Eclipse Vert.x: Information disclosure via improper handling of HTTP 30x redirects camel-jms: camel-sjms: camel-amqp: camel-mina: camel-netty: camel-netty-http: camel-vertx-http: camel-infinispan: camel-leveldb: camel-cassandraql: camel-consul: camel-sql: Apache Camel: Information disclosure via deserialization of untrusted data camel-aws2-sqs: Apache Camel: Camel-AWS2-SQS: Inbound message attributes are mapped into the Exchange without an inbound HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a message sender to inject Camel control headers camel-nats: Apache Camel: Camel-NATS: Inbound NATS message headers are mapped into the Exchange without a configured HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a client that can publish to the subject to inject Camel control headers camel-solr: Apache Camel: Camel-Solr: The SolrParam. and SolrField. Exchange header prefixes used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to inject Solr query parameters (server-side request forgery) and document fields org.apache.sshd/sshd-core: Apache MINA SSHD: Unauthorized command execution due to improper certificate validation org.apache.cxf/cxf:…</p> <p>jetty-security: Eclipse Jetty: Authentication bypass via Digest authentication encoding collision jetty: Eclipse Jetty: Information disclosure due to retained HTTP/1.1 trailers across connections org.bouncycastle/bc-java: org.bouncycastle/bc-lts-java: Bouncy Castle for Java: Cryptographic signature bypass in RSA PKCS#1 verification vertx-core: Eclipse Vert.x: Information disclosure via improper handling of HTTP 30x redirects camel-jms: camel-sjms: camel-amqp: camel-mina: camel-netty: camel-netty-http: camel-vertx-http: camel-infinispan: camel-leveldb: camel-cassandraql: camel-consul: camel-sql: Apache Camel: Information disclosure via deserialization of untrusted data camel-aws2-sqs: Apache Camel: Camel-AWS2-SQS: Inbound message attributes are mapped into the Exchange without an inbound HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a message sender to inject Camel control headers camel-nats: Apache Camel: Camel-NATS: Inbound NATS message headers are mapped into the Exchange without a configured HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a client that can publish to the subject to inject Camel control headers camel-solr: Apache Camel: Camel-Solr: The SolrParam. and SolrField. Exchange header prefixes used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to inject Solr query parameters (server-side request forgery) and document fields org.apache.sshd/sshd-core: Apache MINA SSHD: Unauthorized command execution due to improper certificate validation org.apache.cxf/cxf:…</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/rhsa-2026:71675