<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-97905</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97905</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(),
i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus
masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate
kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator
left behind:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_online()
    cpufreq_policy_alloc()
      alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */
      kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */
    cpufreq_policy_online()
      cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable
while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on
policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero
bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not
initialized yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(),
i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus
masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate
kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator
left behind:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_online()
    cpufreq_policy_alloc()
      alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */
      kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */
    cpufreq_policy_online()
      cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable
while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on
policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero
bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not
initialized yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97905</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-p8mx-g9vj-j29m</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-p8mx-g9vj-j29m</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(),
i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus
masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate
kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator
left behind:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_online()
    cpufreq_policy_alloc()
      alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */
      kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */
    cpufreq_policy_online()
      cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable
while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on
policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero
bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not
initialized yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(),
i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus
masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate
kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator
left behind:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpufreq_online()
    cpufreq_policy_alloc()
      alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */
      kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */
    cpufreq_policy_online()
      cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable
while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on
policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero
bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not
initialized yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-p8mx-g9vj-j29m</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97905</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97905</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(), i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator left behind:   cpufreq_online()     cpufreq_policy_alloc()       alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */       kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */     cpufreq_policy_online()       cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */ This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not initialized yet. Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: zero-initialize policy cpumask before sysfs publication cpufreq_policy_alloc() allocates policy-&amp;gt;cpus with alloc_cpumask_var(), i.e. without __GFP_ZERO, unlike the sibling related_cpus and real_cpus masks. With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y the mask is a separate kmalloc_node() allocation, so its bitmap holds whatever the slab allocator left behind:   cpufreq_online()     cpufreq_policy_alloc()       alloc_cpumask_var(&amp;amp;policy-&amp;gt;cpus)    /* bitmap is uninitialized */       kobject_init_and_add()              /* policy%u/ appears in sysfs */     cpufreq_policy_online()       cpumask_copy(policy-&amp;gt;cpus, cpumask_of(cpu))  /* first valid value */ This leaves a window in which the sysfs attributes are already reachable while policy-&amp;gt;cpus is still garbage. show()/store() gate on policy_is_inactive(), i.e. cpumask_empty(policy-&amp;gt;cpus), so a non-zero bitmap makes them run the attribute callbacks on a policy that is not initialized yet. Fix this by using zalloc_cpumask_var() for policy-&amp;gt;cpus.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97905</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3579 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
