<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2021-20230</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2021-20230</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; stunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in stunnel before 5.57, where it improperly validates client certificates when it is configured to use both redirect and verifyChain options. This flaw allows an attacker with a certificate signed by a Certificate Authority, which is not the one accepted by the stunnel server, to access the tunneled service instead of being redirected to the address specified in the redirect option. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; stunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in stunnel before 5.57, where it improperly validates client certificates when it is configured to use both redirect and verifyChain options. This flaw allows an attacker with a certificate signed by a Certificate Authority, which is not the one accepted by the stunnel server, to access the tunneled service instead of being redirected to the address specified in the redirect option. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2021-20230</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-6901-1 — stunnel4 vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-6901-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: stunnel4, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: stunnel4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that stunnel did not properly validate client
certificates when configured to use both the redirect and verifyChain
options. A remote attacker could potentially use this issue to obtain
sensitive information by accessing the tunneled service.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: stunnel4, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: stunnel4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that stunnel did not properly validate client
certificates when configured to use both the redirect and verifyChain
options. A remote attacker could potentially use this issue to obtain
sensitive information by accessing the tunneled service.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-6901-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
