<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 21:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-78123</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-78123</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; strongSwan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strongSwan 5.0.2 through 6.0.7 has an Expired Pointer Dereference in PKCS#7 parsing in the openssl plugin.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; strongSwan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strongSwan 5.0.2 through 6.0.7 has an Expired Pointer Dereference in PKCS#7 parsing in the openssl plugin.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-78123</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8789-1 — strongswan vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8789-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: strongswan, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: strongswan, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: strongswan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled PKCS#7 containers
in the openssl plugin. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause strongSwan to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
(CVE-2026-78123)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
enumerating certificates in PKCS#7 containers in the openssl plugin.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive
information. (CVE-2026-78124)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled
AKA-Synchronization-Failure messages in the eap-aka plugin. A remote
attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to crash,
resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-78126)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
stringifying IKE messages. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to obtain sensitive information. (CVE-2026-78127)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled PKCS#5 decryption.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to
consume excessive resources, leading to a denial of service.
(CVE-2026-78129)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled attribute
certificates in the x509 plugin when the issuer name was missing. A
remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to
crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-78130)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
parsing attribute certificates in the x509 plugin. A re…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: strongswan, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: strongswan, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: strongswan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled PKCS#7 containers
in the openssl plugin. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause strongSwan to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
(CVE-2026-78123)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
enumerating certificates in PKCS#7 containers in the openssl plugin.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive
information. (CVE-2026-78124)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled
AKA-Synchronization-Failure messages in the eap-aka plugin. A remote
attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to crash,
resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-78126)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
stringifying IKE messages. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to obtain sensitive information. (CVE-2026-78127)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled PKCS#5 decryption.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to
consume excessive resources, leading to a denial of service.
(CVE-2026-78129)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled attribute
certificates in the x509 plugin when the issuer name was missing. A
remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause strongSwan to
crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-78130)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that strongSwan incorrectly handled memory when
parsing attribute certificates in the x509 plugin. A re…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8789-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
