<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-68214 — timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68214</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a race condition between timer_shutdown_sync() and timer
expiration that can lead to hitting a WARN_ON in expire_timers().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue occurs when timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
to NULL while the timer is still running on another CPU. The race
scenario looks like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0					CPU1
					&amp;lt;SOFTIRQ&amp;gt;
					lock_timer_base()
					expire_timers()
					base-&amp;gt;running_timer = timer;
					unlock_timer_base()
					[call_timer_fn enter]
					mod_timer()
					...
timer_shutdown_sync()
lock_timer_base()
// For now, will not detach the timer but only clear its function to NULL
if (base-&amp;gt;running_timer != timer)
	ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
	timer-&amp;gt;function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()
					[call_timer_fn exit]
					lock_timer_base()
					base-&amp;gt;running_timer = NULL;
					unlock_timer_base()
					...
					// Now timer is pending while its function set to NULL.
					// next timer trigger
					&amp;lt;SOFTIRQ&amp;gt;
					expire_timers()
					WARN_ON_ONCE(!fn) // hit
					...
lock_timer_base()
// Now timer will detach
if (base-&amp;gt;running_timer != timer)
	ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
	timer-&amp;gt;function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
regardless of whether the timer is currently running. This can leave a
pending timer with a NULL functi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a race condition between timer_shutdown_sync() and timer
expiration that can lead to hitting a WARN_ON in expire_timers().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue occurs when timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
to NULL while the timer is still running on another CPU. The race
scenario looks like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0					CPU1
					&amp;lt;SOFTIRQ&amp;gt;
					lock_timer_base()
					expire_timers()
					base-&amp;gt;running_timer = timer;
					unlock_timer_base()
					[call_timer_fn enter]
					mod_timer()
					...
timer_shutdown_sync()
lock_timer_base()
// For now, will not detach the timer but only clear its function to NULL
if (base-&amp;gt;running_timer != timer)
	ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
	timer-&amp;gt;function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()
					[call_timer_fn exit]
					lock_timer_base()
					base-&amp;gt;running_timer = NULL;
					unlock_timer_base()
					...
					// Now timer is pending while its function set to NULL.
					// next timer trigger
					&amp;lt;SOFTIRQ&amp;gt;
					expire_timers()
					WARN_ON_ONCE(!fn) // hit
					...
lock_timer_base()
// Now timer will detach
if (base-&amp;gt;running_timer != timer)
	ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
	timer-&amp;gt;function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
regardless of whether the timer is currently running. This can leave a
pending timer with a NULL functi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
