https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:29:36 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52510 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe</p> <p>If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(), it calls clk_unregister() to release priv-&gt;clk and returns an error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(), where priv-&gt;clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call clk_unregister().</p> <p>Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv-&gt;clk could be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe</p> <p>If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(), it calls clk_unregister() to release priv-&gt;clk and returns an error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(), where priv-&gt;clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call clk_unregister().</p> <p>Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv-&gt;clk could be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52510