<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 01:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-52527 — ipv4, ipv6: Fix handling of transhdrlen in __ip{,6}_append_data()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4, ipv6: Fix handling of transhdrlen in __ip{,6}_append_data()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Including the transhdrlen in length is a problem when the packet is
partially filled (e.g. something like send(MSG_MORE) happened previously)
when appending to an IPv4 or IPv6 packet as we don&amp;#39;t want to repeat the
transport header or account for it twice.  This can happen under some
circumstances, such as splicing into an L2TP socket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The symptom observed is a warning in __ip6_append_data():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5042 at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 __ip6_append_data.isra.0+0x1be8/0x47f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that occurs when MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used to append more data to an already
partially occupied skbuff.  The warning occurs when &amp;#39;copy&amp;#39; is larger than
the amount of data in the message iterator.  This is because the requested
length includes the transport header length when it shouldn&amp;#39;t.  This can be
triggered by, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_L2TP);
        bind(sfd, ...); // ::1
        connect(sfd, ...); // ::1 port 7
        send(sfd, buffer, 4100, MSG_MORE);
        sendfile(sfd, dfd, NULL, 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only adding transhdrlen into the length if the write queue is
empty in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg(), analogously to how UDP does things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2tp_ip_sendmsg() looks like it won&amp;#39;t suffer from this problem as it builds
the UDP packet itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4, ipv6: Fix handling of transhdrlen in __ip{,6}_append_data()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Including the transhdrlen in length is a problem when the packet is
partially filled (e.g. something like send(MSG_MORE) happened previously)
when appending to an IPv4 or IPv6 packet as we don&amp;#39;t want to repeat the
transport header or account for it twice.  This can happen under some
circumstances, such as splicing into an L2TP socket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The symptom observed is a warning in __ip6_append_data():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5042 at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 __ip6_append_data.isra.0+0x1be8/0x47f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that occurs when MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used to append more data to an already
partially occupied skbuff.  The warning occurs when &amp;#39;copy&amp;#39; is larger than
the amount of data in the message iterator.  This is because the requested
length includes the transport header length when it shouldn&amp;#39;t.  This can be
triggered by, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_L2TP);
        bind(sfd, ...); // ::1
        connect(sfd, ...); // ::1 port 7
        send(sfd, buffer, 4100, MSG_MORE);
        sendfile(sfd, dfd, NULL, 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only adding transhdrlen into the length if the write queue is
empty in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg(), analogously to how UDP does things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2tp_ip_sendmsg() looks like it won&amp;#39;t suffer from this problem as it builds
the UDP packet itself.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
