<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-36936 — efi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-36936</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;efi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 50e782a86c98 (&amp;#34;efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by
parallel memory acceptance&amp;#34;) has released the spinlock so other CPUs can
do memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other
CPUs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the
TD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
 Call Trace:
 ? __hrtimer_run_queues
 &amp;lt;IRQ&amp;gt;
 ? hrtimer_interrupt
 ? watchdog_timer_fn
 ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn
 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 &amp;lt;/IRQ&amp;gt;
 ? __hrtimer_run_queues
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 ? hrtimer_interrupt
 ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
 ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 accept_memory
 try_to_accept_memory
 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 get_page_from_freelist
 __handle_mm_fault
 __alloc_pages
 __folio_alloc
 ? __tdx_hypercall
 handle_mm_fault
 vma_alloc_folio
 do_user_addr_fault
 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 exc_page_fault
 ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 asm_exc_page_fault
 __handle_mm_fault&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the
softlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for
a while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by
spinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a
while, which…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;efi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 50e782a86c98 (&amp;#34;efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by
parallel memory acceptance&amp;#34;) has released the spinlock so other CPUs can
do memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other
CPUs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the
TD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
 Call Trace:
 ? __hrtimer_run_queues
 &amp;lt;IRQ&amp;gt;
 ? hrtimer_interrupt
 ? watchdog_timer_fn
 ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn
 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 &amp;lt;/IRQ&amp;gt;
 ? __hrtimer_run_queues
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 ? hrtimer_interrupt
 ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
 ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
 accept_memory
 try_to_accept_memory
 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 get_page_from_freelist
 __handle_mm_fault
 __alloc_pages
 __folio_alloc
 ? __tdx_hypercall
 handle_mm_fault
 vma_alloc_folio
 do_user_addr_fault
 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 exc_page_fault
 ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page
 asm_exc_page_fault
 __handle_mm_fault&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the
softlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for
a while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by
spinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a
while, which…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-36936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
