<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-39463 — 9p: add missing locking around taking dentry fid list</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-39463</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, linux_kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9p: add missing locking around taking dentry fid list&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix a use-after-free on dentry&amp;#39;s d_fsdata fid list when a thread
looks up a fid through dentry while another thread unlinks it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UAF thread:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
 p9_fid_get linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:262
 v9fs_fid_find+0x236/0x280 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:129
 v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid linux/fs/9p/fid.c:181
 v9fs_fid_lookup+0xbf/0xc20 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:314
 v9fs_vfs_getattr_dotl+0xf9/0x360 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c:400
 vfs_statx+0xdd/0x4d0 linux/fs/stat.c:248&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freed by:
 p9_fid_destroy (inlined)
 p9_client_clunk+0xb0/0xe0 linux/net/9p/client.c:1456
 p9_fid_put linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:278
 v9fs_dentry_release+0xb5/0x140 linux/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c:55
 v9fs_remove+0x38f/0x620 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:518
 vfs_unlink+0x29a/0x810 linux/fs/namei.c:4335&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that d_fsdata was not accessed under d_lock, because
d_release() normally is only called once the dentry is otherwise no
longer accessible but since we also call it explicitly in v9fs_remove
that lock is required:
move the hlist out of the dentry under lock then unref its fids once
they are no longer accessible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, linux_kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9p: add missing locking around taking dentry fid list&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix a use-after-free on dentry&amp;#39;s d_fsdata fid list when a thread
looks up a fid through dentry while another thread unlinks it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UAF thread:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
 p9_fid_get linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:262
 v9fs_fid_find+0x236/0x280 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:129
 v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid linux/fs/9p/fid.c:181
 v9fs_fid_lookup+0xbf/0xc20 linux/fs/9p/fid.c:314
 v9fs_vfs_getattr_dotl+0xf9/0x360 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c:400
 vfs_statx+0xdd/0x4d0 linux/fs/stat.c:248&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freed by:
 p9_fid_destroy (inlined)
 p9_client_clunk+0xb0/0xe0 linux/net/9p/client.c:1456
 p9_fid_put linux/./include/net/9p/client.h:278
 v9fs_dentry_release+0xb5/0x140 linux/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c:55
 v9fs_remove+0x38f/0x620 linux/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:518
 vfs_unlink+0x29a/0x810 linux/fs/namei.c:4335&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that d_fsdata was not accessed under d_lock, because
d_release() normally is only called once the dentry is otherwise no
longer accessible but since we also call it explicitly in v9fs_remove
that lock is required:
move the hlist out of the dentry under lock then unref its fids once
they are no longer accessible.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-39463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
