<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-53121 — net/mlx5: fs, lock FTE when checking if active</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-53121</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/mlx5: fs, lock FTE when checking if active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The referenced commits introduced a two-step process for deleting FTEs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Lock the FTE, delete it from hardware, set the hardware deletion function
  to NULL and unlock the FTE.
- Lock the parent flow group, delete the software copy of the FTE, and
  remove it from the xarray.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this approach encounters a race condition if a rule with the same
match value is added simultaneously. In this scenario, fs_core may set the
hardware deletion function to NULL prematurely, causing a panic during
subsequent rule deletions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To prevent this, ensure the active flag of the FTE is checked under a lock,
which will prevent the fs_core layer from attaching a new steering rule to
an FTE that is in the process of deletion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  438.967589] MOSHE: 2496 mlx5_del_flow_rules del_hw_func
[  438.968205] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  438.968654] refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
[  438.969249] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8957 at lib/refcount.c:31 refcount_warn_saturate+0xfb/0x110
[  438.970054] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_flower act_gact sch_ingress openvswitch nsh mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa mlx5_ib mlx5_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm ib_…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/mlx5: fs, lock FTE when checking if active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The referenced commits introduced a two-step process for deleting FTEs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Lock the FTE, delete it from hardware, set the hardware deletion function
  to NULL and unlock the FTE.
- Lock the parent flow group, delete the software copy of the FTE, and
  remove it from the xarray.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this approach encounters a race condition if a rule with the same
match value is added simultaneously. In this scenario, fs_core may set the
hardware deletion function to NULL prematurely, causing a panic during
subsequent rule deletions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To prevent this, ensure the active flag of the FTE is checked under a lock,
which will prevent the fs_core layer from attaching a new steering rule to
an FTE that is in the process of deletion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[  438.967589] MOSHE: 2496 mlx5_del_flow_rules del_hw_func
[  438.968205] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  438.968654] refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
[  438.969249] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8957 at lib/refcount.c:31 refcount_warn_saturate+0xfb/0x110
[  438.970054] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_flower act_gact sch_ingress openvswitch nsh mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa mlx5_ib mlx5_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm ib_…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-53121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
