<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-56723 — mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use IRQ domain for PMIC devices</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-56723</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use IRQ domain for PMIC devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While design wise the idea of converting the driver to use
the hierarchy of the IRQ chips is correct, the implementation
has (inherited) flaws. This was unveiled when platform_get_irq()
had started WARN() on IRQ 0 that is supposed to be a Linux
IRQ number (also known as vIRQ).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rework the driver to respect IRQ domain when creating each MFD
device separately, as the domain is not the same for all of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use IRQ domain for PMIC devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While design wise the idea of converting the driver to use
the hierarchy of the IRQ chips is correct, the implementation
has (inherited) flaws. This was unveiled when platform_get_irq()
had started WARN() on IRQ 0 that is supposed to be a Linux
IRQ number (also known as vIRQ).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rework the driver to respect IRQ domain when creating each MFD
device separately, as the domain is not the same for all of them.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-56723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
