<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 12:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-57917 — topology: Keep the cpumask unchanged when printing cpumap</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-57917</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;topology: Keep the cpumask unchanged when printing cpumap&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During fuzz testing, the following warning was discovered:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;different return values (15 and 11) from vsnprintf(&amp;#34;%*pbl
 &amp;#34;, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;test:keyward is WARNING in kvasprintf
 WARNING: CPU: 55 PID: 1168477 at lib/kasprintf.c:30 kvasprintf+0x121/0x130
 Call Trace:
  kvasprintf+0x121/0x130
  kasprintf+0xa6/0xe0
  bitmap_print_to_buf+0x89/0x100
  core_siblings_list_read+0x7e/0xb0
  kernfs_file_read_iter+0x15b/0x270
  new_sync_read+0x153/0x260
  vfs_read+0x215/0x290
  ksys_read+0xb9/0x160
  do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The call trace shows that kvasprintf() reported this warning during the
printing of core_siblings_list. kvasprintf() has several steps:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) First, calculate the length of the resulting formatted string.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Allocate a buffer based on the returned length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) Then, perform the actual string formatting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Check whether the lengths of the formatted strings returned in
     steps (1) and (2) are consistent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the core_cpumask is modified between steps (1) and (3), the lengths
obtained in these two steps may not match. Indeed our test includes cpu
hotplugging, which should modify core_cpumask while printing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this issue, cache the cpumask into a temporary variable before
calling cpumap_print_{list, cpumask}_to_buf(), to keep it unchanged
during the printing process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;topology: Keep the cpumask unchanged when printing cpumap&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During fuzz testing, the following warning was discovered:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;different return values (15 and 11) from vsnprintf(&amp;#34;%*pbl
 &amp;#34;, ...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;test:keyward is WARNING in kvasprintf
 WARNING: CPU: 55 PID: 1168477 at lib/kasprintf.c:30 kvasprintf+0x121/0x130
 Call Trace:
  kvasprintf+0x121/0x130
  kasprintf+0xa6/0xe0
  bitmap_print_to_buf+0x89/0x100
  core_siblings_list_read+0x7e/0xb0
  kernfs_file_read_iter+0x15b/0x270
  new_sync_read+0x153/0x260
  vfs_read+0x215/0x290
  ksys_read+0xb9/0x160
  do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The call trace shows that kvasprintf() reported this warning during the
printing of core_siblings_list. kvasprintf() has several steps:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) First, calculate the length of the resulting formatted string.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Allocate a buffer based on the returned length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) Then, perform the actual string formatting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Check whether the lengths of the formatted strings returned in
     steps (1) and (2) are consistent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the core_cpumask is modified between steps (1) and (3), the lengths
obtained in these two steps may not match. Indeed our test includes cpu
hotplugging, which should modify core_cpumask while printing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this issue, cache the cpumask into a temporary variable before
calling cpumap_print_{list, cpumask}_to_buf(), to keep it unchanged
during the printing process.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-57917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
