<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-21834 — seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21834</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached
process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp
filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known
syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp
to control their syscall surface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since uretprobe is a &amp;#34;kernel implementation detail&amp;#34; system call which is
not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and
there&amp;#39;s very little point in forcing all userspace applications to
explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn&amp;#39;t expected to ever be
supported in i386.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[kees: minimized changes for easier backporting, tweaked commit log]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached
process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp
filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known
syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp
to control their syscall surface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since uretprobe is a &amp;#34;kernel implementation detail&amp;#34; system call which is
not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and
there&amp;#39;s very little point in forcing all userspace applications to
explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn&amp;#39;t expected to ever be
supported in i386.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[kees: minimized changes for easier backporting, tweaked commit log]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
