<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-37959 — bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37959</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in
another network namespace, the skb isn&amp;#39;t scrubbed. That can lead skb
information from one namespace to be &amp;#34;misused&amp;#34; in another namespace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using
bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec
decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1)
the packet path from the host&amp;#39;s XFRM layer to the container&amp;#39;s XFRM
layer where it&amp;#39;s dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at
each function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NETNS       MARK  IFACE  TUPLE                                FUNC
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  xfrm_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  xfrm4_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  gro_cells_receive
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    [...]
    4026533547  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  skb_do_redirect
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  ip_rcv
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.2…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in
another network namespace, the skb isn&amp;#39;t scrubbed. That can lead skb
information from one namespace to be &amp;#34;misused&amp;#34; in another namespace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using
bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec
decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1)
the packet path from the host&amp;#39;s XFRM layer to the container&amp;#39;s XFRM
layer where it&amp;#39;s dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at
each function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NETNS       MARK  IFACE  TUPLE                                FUNC
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  xfrm_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  xfrm4_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  gro_cells_receive
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    [...]
    4026533547  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  skb_do_redirect
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.244.2.158:53  ip_rcv
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473-&amp;gt;10.2…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
