<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-37960 — memblock: Accept allocated memory before use in memblock_double_array()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37960</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;memblock: Accept allocated memory before use in memblock_double_array()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When increasing the array size in memblock_double_array() and the slab
is not yet available, a call to memblock_find_in_range() is used to
reserve/allocate memory. However, the range returned may not have been
accepted, which can result in a crash when booting an SNP guest:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RIP: 0010:memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130
  Code: ...
  RSP: 0000:ffffffff9cc03ce8 EFLAGS: 00010006
  RAX: ff11001ff83e5000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: fffffffffffff000
  RDX: 0000000000000bc0 RSI: ffffffff9dba8860 RDI: ff11001ff83e5c00
  RBP: 0000000000002000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000002000
  R10: 000000207fffe000 R11: 0000040000000000 R12: ffffffff9d06ef78
  R13: ff11001ff83e5000 R14: ffffffff9dba7c60 R15: 0000000000000c00
  memblock_double_array+0xff/0x310
  memblock_add_range+0x1fb/0x2f0
  memblock_reserve+0x4f/0xa0
  memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xac/0x130
  memblock_alloc_internal+0x53/0xc0
  memblock_alloc_try_nid+0x3d/0xa0
  swiotlb_init_remap+0x149/0x2f0
  mem_init+0xb/0xb0
  mm_core_init+0x8f/0x350
  start_kernel+0x17e/0x5d0
  x86_64_start_reservations+0x14/0x30
  x86_64_start_kernel+0x92/0xa0
  secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x194/0x19b&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitigate this by calling accept_memory() on the memory range returned
before the slab is available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to v6.12, the accept_memory() interface used a &amp;#39;start&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;end&amp;#39;
parameter instead of &amp;#39;start&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;size&amp;#39;, therefo…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;memblock: Accept allocated memory before use in memblock_double_array()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When increasing the array size in memblock_double_array() and the slab
is not yet available, a call to memblock_find_in_range() is used to
reserve/allocate memory. However, the range returned may not have been
accepted, which can result in a crash when booting an SNP guest:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RIP: 0010:memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130
  Code: ...
  RSP: 0000:ffffffff9cc03ce8 EFLAGS: 00010006
  RAX: ff11001ff83e5000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: fffffffffffff000
  RDX: 0000000000000bc0 RSI: ffffffff9dba8860 RDI: ff11001ff83e5c00
  RBP: 0000000000002000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000002000
  R10: 000000207fffe000 R11: 0000040000000000 R12: ffffffff9d06ef78
  R13: ff11001ff83e5000 R14: ffffffff9dba7c60 R15: 0000000000000c00
  memblock_double_array+0xff/0x310
  memblock_add_range+0x1fb/0x2f0
  memblock_reserve+0x4f/0xa0
  memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xac/0x130
  memblock_alloc_internal+0x53/0xc0
  memblock_alloc_try_nid+0x3d/0xa0
  swiotlb_init_remap+0x149/0x2f0
  mem_init+0xb/0xb0
  mm_core_init+0x8f/0x350
  start_kernel+0x17e/0x5d0
  x86_64_start_reservations+0x14/0x30
  x86_64_start_kernel+0x92/0xa0
  secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x194/0x19b&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitigate this by calling accept_memory() on the memory range returned
before the slab is available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to v6.12, the accept_memory() interface used a &amp;#39;start&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;end&amp;#39;
parameter instead of &amp;#39;start&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;size&amp;#39;, therefo…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
