<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-38067 — rseq: Fix segfault on registration when rseq_cs is non-zero</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38067</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rseq: Fix segfault on registration when rseq_cs is non-zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rseq_cs field is documented as being set to 0 by user-space prior to
registration, however this is not currently enforced by the kernel. This
can result in a segfault on return to user-space if the value stored in
the rseq_cs field doesn&amp;#39;t point to a valid struct rseq_cs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The correct solution to this would be to fail the rseq registration when
the rseq_cs field is non-zero. However, some older versions of glibc
will reuse the rseq area of previous threads without clearing the
rseq_cs field and will also terminate the process if the rseq
registration fails in a secondary thread. This wasn&amp;#39;t caught in testing
because in this case the leftover rseq_cs does point to a valid struct
rseq_cs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we can do is clear the rseq_cs field on registration when it&amp;#39;s
non-zero which will prevent segfaults on registration and won&amp;#39;t break
the glibc versions that reuse rseq areas on thread creation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rseq: Fix segfault on registration when rseq_cs is non-zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rseq_cs field is documented as being set to 0 by user-space prior to
registration, however this is not currently enforced by the kernel. This
can result in a segfault on return to user-space if the value stored in
the rseq_cs field doesn&amp;#39;t point to a valid struct rseq_cs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The correct solution to this would be to fail the rseq registration when
the rseq_cs field is non-zero. However, some older versions of glibc
will reuse the rseq area of previous threads without clearing the
rseq_cs field and will also terminate the process if the rseq
registration fails in a secondary thread. This wasn&amp;#39;t caught in testing
because in this case the leftover rseq_cs does point to a valid struct
rseq_cs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we can do is clear the rseq_cs field on registration when it&amp;#39;s
non-zero which will prevent segfaults on registration and won&amp;#39;t break
the glibc versions that reuse rseq areas on thread creation.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
