<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-38163 — f2fs: fix to do sanity check on sbi-&gt;total_valid_block_count</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38163</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to do sanity check on sbi-&amp;gt;total_valid_block_count&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521!
RIP: 0010:dec_valid_block_count+0x3b2/0x3c0 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521
Call Trace:
 f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0xc8c/0x11a0 fs/f2fs/file.c:695
 truncate_dnode+0x417/0x740 fs/f2fs/node.c:973
 truncate_nodes+0x3ec/0xf50 fs/f2fs/node.c:1014
 f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks+0x8e3/0x1370 fs/f2fs/node.c:1197
 f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x840/0x12b0 fs/f2fs/file.c:810
 f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10d/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:838
 f2fs_truncate+0x417/0x720 fs/f2fs/file.c:888
 f2fs_setattr+0xc4f/0x12f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1112
 notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:552
 do_truncate+0x222/0x310 fs/open.c:65
 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3466 [inline]
 do_open fs/namei.c:3849 [inline]
 path_openat+0x2e4f/0x35d0 fs/namei.c:4004
 do_filp_open+0x284/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4031
 do_sys_openat2+0x12b/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1429
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline]
 __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1522 [inline]
 __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1516 [inline]
 __x64_sys_creat+0x124/0x170 fs/open.c:1516
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason is: in fuzzed image, sbi-&amp;gt;total_valid_block_count is
inconsistent w/ mapped blocks indexed by inode, so, we should
not trigger panic for such case, instead, let&amp;#39;s print log and
set fsck fla…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to do sanity check on sbi-&amp;gt;total_valid_block_count&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521!
RIP: 0010:dec_valid_block_count+0x3b2/0x3c0 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2521
Call Trace:
 f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0xc8c/0x11a0 fs/f2fs/file.c:695
 truncate_dnode+0x417/0x740 fs/f2fs/node.c:973
 truncate_nodes+0x3ec/0xf50 fs/f2fs/node.c:1014
 f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks+0x8e3/0x1370 fs/f2fs/node.c:1197
 f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x840/0x12b0 fs/f2fs/file.c:810
 f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10d/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:838
 f2fs_truncate+0x417/0x720 fs/f2fs/file.c:888
 f2fs_setattr+0xc4f/0x12f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1112
 notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:552
 do_truncate+0x222/0x310 fs/open.c:65
 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3466 [inline]
 do_open fs/namei.c:3849 [inline]
 path_openat+0x2e4f/0x35d0 fs/namei.c:4004
 do_filp_open+0x284/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4031
 do_sys_openat2+0x12b/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1429
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline]
 __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1522 [inline]
 __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1516 [inline]
 __x64_sys_creat+0x124/0x170 fs/open.c:1516
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason is: in fuzzed image, sbi-&amp;gt;total_valid_block_count is
inconsistent w/ mapped blocks indexed by inode, so, we should
not trigger panic for such case, instead, let&amp;#39;s print log and
set fsck fla…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
