https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:27:31 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38313 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev</p> <p>The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.</p> <p>In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.</p> <p>This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive.</p> <p>WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev</p> <p>The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.</p> <p>In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.</p> <p>This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive.</p> <p>WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38313