<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-39911 — i40e: fix IRQ freeing in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix error path</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-39911</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i40e: fix IRQ freeing in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix error path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If request_irq() in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix() fails in an iteration
later than the first, the error path wants to free the IRQs requested
so far. However, it uses the wrong dev_id argument for free_irq(), so
it does not free the IRQs correctly and instead triggers the warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trying to free already-free IRQ 173
 WARNING: CPU: 25 PID: 1091 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1829 __free_irq+0x192/0x2c0
 Modules linked in: i40e(+) [...]
 CPU: 25 UID: 0 PID: 1091 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
 Hardware name: [...]
 RIP: 0010:__free_irq+0x192/0x2c0
 [...]
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  free_irq+0x32/0x70
  i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix.cold+0x63/0x8b [i40e]
  i40e_vsi_request_irq+0x79/0x80 [i40e]
  i40e_vsi_open+0x21f/0x2f0 [i40e]
  i40e_open+0x63/0x130 [i40e]
  __dev_open+0xfc/0x210
  __dev_change_flags+0x1fc/0x240
  netif_change_flags+0x27/0x70
  do_setlink.isra.0+0x341/0xc70
  rtnl_newlink+0x468/0x860
  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x375/0x450
  netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x110
  netlink_unicast+0x288/0x3c0
  netlink_sendmsg+0x20d/0x430
  ____sys_sendmsg+0x3a2/0x3d0
  ___sys_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0
  __sys_sendmsg+0x8a/0xf0
  do_syscall_64+0x82/0x2c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
  [...]
  &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use the same dev_id for free_irq() as for request_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tested this with inserting code to fail intention…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i40e: fix IRQ freeing in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix error path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If request_irq() in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix() fails in an iteration
later than the first, the error path wants to free the IRQs requested
so far. However, it uses the wrong dev_id argument for free_irq(), so
it does not free the IRQs correctly and instead triggers the warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trying to free already-free IRQ 173
 WARNING: CPU: 25 PID: 1091 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1829 __free_irq+0x192/0x2c0
 Modules linked in: i40e(+) [...]
 CPU: 25 UID: 0 PID: 1091 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
 Hardware name: [...]
 RIP: 0010:__free_irq+0x192/0x2c0
 [...]
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  free_irq+0x32/0x70
  i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix.cold+0x63/0x8b [i40e]
  i40e_vsi_request_irq+0x79/0x80 [i40e]
  i40e_vsi_open+0x21f/0x2f0 [i40e]
  i40e_open+0x63/0x130 [i40e]
  __dev_open+0xfc/0x210
  __dev_change_flags+0x1fc/0x240
  netif_change_flags+0x27/0x70
  do_setlink.isra.0+0x341/0xc70
  rtnl_newlink+0x468/0x860
  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x375/0x450
  netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x110
  netlink_unicast+0x288/0x3c0
  netlink_sendmsg+0x20d/0x430
  ____sys_sendmsg+0x3a2/0x3d0
  ___sys_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0
  __sys_sendmsg+0x8a/0xf0
  do_syscall_64+0x82/0x2c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
  [...]
  &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use the same dev_id for free_irq() as for request_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tested this with inserting code to fail intention…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-39911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
