<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-40248 — vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40248</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already
established socket leads to several issues:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -&amp;gt;
   virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking
   virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated
   `vvs-&amp;gt;bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. connect() resetting a connected socket&amp;#39;s state may race with socket
   being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap
   breaks sockmap&amp;#39;s assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -&amp;gt; SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a
   transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for
   any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a
   use-after-free/null-ptr-deref.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected
sockets: they don&amp;#39;t linger, can&amp;#39;t be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by
sendmsg().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e07fd95c-9a38-4eea-9638-133e38c2ec9b@rbox.co/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250317-vsock-trans-signal-race-v4-0-fc8837f3f1d4@rbox.co/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60f1b7db-3099-4f6a-875e-af9f6ef194f6@rbox.co/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already
established socket leads to several issues:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -&amp;gt;
   virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking
   virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated
   `vvs-&amp;gt;bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. connect() resetting a connected socket&amp;#39;s state may race with socket
   being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap
   breaks sockmap&amp;#39;s assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -&amp;gt; SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a
   transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for
   any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a
   use-after-free/null-ptr-deref.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected
sockets: they don&amp;#39;t linger, can&amp;#39;t be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by
sendmsg().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e07fd95c-9a38-4eea-9638-133e38c2ec9b@rbox.co/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250317-vsock-trans-signal-race-v4-0-fc8837f3f1d4@rbox.co/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60f1b7db-3099-4f6a-875e-af9f6ef194f6@rbox.co/&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
