<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-68202 — sched_ext: Fix unsafe locking in the scx_dump_state()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68202</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix unsafe locking in the scx_dump_state()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the dump_lock will be converted
sleepable spinlock and not disable-irq, so the following scenarios occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
irq_work/0/27 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
   lock_acquire+0x1e1/0x510
   _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x42/0x80
   raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
   sched_tick+0xae/0x7b0
   update_process_times+0x14c/0x1b0
   tick_periodic+0x62/0x1f0
   tick_handle_periodic+0x48/0xf0
   timer_interrupt+0x55/0x80
   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20a/0x5c0
   handle_irq_event_percpu+0x18/0xc0
   handle_irq_event+0xb5/0x150
   handle_level_irq+0x220/0x460
   __common_interrupt+0xa2/0x1e0
   common_interrupt+0xb0/0xd0
   asm_common_interrupt+0x2b/0x40
   _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x80
   __setup_irq+0xc34/0x1a30
   request_threaded_irq+0x214/0x2f0
   hpet_time_init+0x3e/0x60
   x86_late_time_init+0x5b/0xb0
   start_kernel+0x308/0x410
   x86_64_start_reservations+0x1c/0x30
   x86_64_start_kernel+0x96/0xa0
   common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock);
   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
     lock(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix unsafe locking in the scx_dump_state()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the dump_lock will be converted
sleepable spinlock and not disable-irq, so the following scenarios occur:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
irq_work/0/27 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
   lock_acquire+0x1e1/0x510
   _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x42/0x80
   raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
   sched_tick+0xae/0x7b0
   update_process_times+0x14c/0x1b0
   tick_periodic+0x62/0x1f0
   tick_handle_periodic+0x48/0xf0
   timer_interrupt+0x55/0x80
   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20a/0x5c0
   handle_irq_event_percpu+0x18/0xc0
   handle_irq_event+0xb5/0x150
   handle_level_irq+0x220/0x460
   __common_interrupt+0xa2/0x1e0
   common_interrupt+0xb0/0xd0
   asm_common_interrupt+0x2b/0x40
   _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x80
   __setup_irq+0xc34/0x1a30
   request_threaded_irq+0x214/0x2f0
   hpet_time_init+0x3e/0x60
   x86_late_time_init+0x5b/0xb0
   start_kernel+0x308/0x410
   x86_64_start_reservations+0x1c/0x30
   x86_64_start_kernel+0x96/0xa0
   common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
        ----
   lock(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock);
   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
     lock(&amp;amp;rq-&amp;gt;__lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
