<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-68299 — afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell's anonymous key</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68299</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell&amp;#39;s anonymous key&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The allocation of a cell&amp;#39;s anonymous key is done in a background thread
along with other cell setup such as doing a DNS upcall.  In the reported
bug, this is triggered by afs_parse_source() parsing the device name given
to mount() and calling afs_lookup_cell() with the name of the cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The normal key lookup then tries to use the key description on the
anonymous authentication key as the reference for request_key() - but it
may not yet be set and so an oops can happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has been made more likely to happen by the fix for dynamic lookup
failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by firstly allocating a reference name and attaching it to the
afs_cell record when the record is created.  It can share the memory
allocation with the cell name (unfortunately it can&amp;#39;t just overlap the cell
name by prepending it with &amp;#34;afs@&amp;#34; as the cell name already has a &amp;#39;.&amp;#39;
prepended for other purposes).  This reference name is then passed to
request_key().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, the anon key is now allocated on demand at the point a key is
requested in afs_request_key() if it is not already allocated.  A mutex is
used to prevent multiple allocation for a cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirdly, make afs_request_key_rcu() return NULL if the anonymous key isn&amp;#39;t
yet allocated (if we need it) and then the caller can return -ECHILD to
drop out of RCU-mode and afs_request_key() can be called.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that the anonymous key is kind of neces…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell&amp;#39;s anonymous key&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The allocation of a cell&amp;#39;s anonymous key is done in a background thread
along with other cell setup such as doing a DNS upcall.  In the reported
bug, this is triggered by afs_parse_source() parsing the device name given
to mount() and calling afs_lookup_cell() with the name of the cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The normal key lookup then tries to use the key description on the
anonymous authentication key as the reference for request_key() - but it
may not yet be set and so an oops can happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has been made more likely to happen by the fix for dynamic lookup
failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by firstly allocating a reference name and attaching it to the
afs_cell record when the record is created.  It can share the memory
allocation with the cell name (unfortunately it can&amp;#39;t just overlap the cell
name by prepending it with &amp;#34;afs@&amp;#34; as the cell name already has a &amp;#39;.&amp;#39;
prepended for other purposes).  This reference name is then passed to
request_key().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, the anon key is now allocated on demand at the point a key is
requested in afs_request_key() if it is not already allocated.  A mutex is
used to prevent multiple allocation for a cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirdly, make afs_request_key_rcu() return NULL if the anonymous key isn&amp;#39;t
yet allocated (if we need it) and then the caller can return -ECHILD to
drop out of RCU-mode and afs_request_key() can be called.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that the anonymous key is kind of neces…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-68299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
