<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23200 — ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23200</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported a kernel BUG in fib6_add_rt2node() when adding an IPv6
route. [0]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit f72514b3c569 (&amp;#34;ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static
route&amp;#34;) introduced logic to clear RTF_ADDRCONF from existing routes
when a static route with the same nexthop is added. However, this
causes a problem when the existing route has a gateway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When RTF_ADDRCONF is cleared from a route that has a gateway, that
route becomes eligible for ECMP, i.e. rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns
true. The issue is that this route was never added to the
fib6_siblings list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to a mismatch between the following counts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The sibling count computed by iterating fib6_next chain, which
  includes the newly ECMP-eligible route&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The actual siblings in fib6_siblings list, which does not include
  that route&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a subsequent ECMP route is added, fib6_add_rt2node() hits
BUG_ON(sibling-&amp;gt;fib6_nsiblings != rt-&amp;gt;fib6_nsiblings) because the
counts don&amp;#39;t match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only clearing RTF_ADDRCONF when the existing route does
not have a gateway. Routes without a gateway cannot qualify for ECMP
anyway (rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() requires fib_nh_gw_family), so clearing
RTF_ADDRCONF on them is safe and matches the original intent of the
commit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[0]:
kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1217!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6010 Comm: syz.0.17 No…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported a kernel BUG in fib6_add_rt2node() when adding an IPv6
route. [0]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit f72514b3c569 (&amp;#34;ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static
route&amp;#34;) introduced logic to clear RTF_ADDRCONF from existing routes
when a static route with the same nexthop is added. However, this
causes a problem when the existing route has a gateway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When RTF_ADDRCONF is cleared from a route that has a gateway, that
route becomes eligible for ECMP, i.e. rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns
true. The issue is that this route was never added to the
fib6_siblings list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to a mismatch between the following counts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The sibling count computed by iterating fib6_next chain, which
  includes the newly ECMP-eligible route&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- The actual siblings in fib6_siblings list, which does not include
  that route&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a subsequent ECMP route is added, fib6_add_rt2node() hits
BUG_ON(sibling-&amp;gt;fib6_nsiblings != rt-&amp;gt;fib6_nsiblings) because the
counts don&amp;#39;t match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only clearing RTF_ADDRCONF when the existing route does
not have a gateway. Routes without a gateway cannot qualify for ECMP
anyway (rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() requires fib_nh_gw_family), so clearing
RTF_ADDRCONF on them is safe and matches the original intent of the
commit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[0]:
kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1217!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6010 Comm: syz.0.17 No…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
