<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-43211 — PCI: Fix pci_slot_trylock() error handling</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43211</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PCI: Fix pci_slot_trylock() error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit a4e772898f8b (&amp;#34;PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()&amp;#34;)
delegates the bridge device&amp;#39;s pci_dev_trylock() to pci_bus_trylock() in
pci_slot_trylock(), but it forgets to remove the corresponding
pci_dev_unlock() when pci_bus_trylock() fails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before a4e772898f8b, the code did:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev)) /* &amp;lt;- lock bridge device */
    goto unlock;
  if (dev-&amp;gt;subordinate) {
    if (!pci_bus_trylock(dev-&amp;gt;subordinate)) {
      pci_dev_unlock(dev);   /* &amp;lt;- unlock bridge device */
      goto unlock;
    }
  }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a4e772898f8b the bridge-device lock is no longer taken, but the
pci_dev_unlock(dev) on the failure path was left in place, leading to the
bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This yields one of two errors:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. A warning that the lock is being unlocked when no one holds it.
  2. An incorrect unlock of a lock that belongs to another thread.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by removing the now-redundant pci_dev_unlock(dev) on the failure
path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Same patch later posted by Keith at
https://patch.msgid.link/20260116184150.3013258-1-kbusch@meta.com]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PCI: Fix pci_slot_trylock() error handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit a4e772898f8b (&amp;#34;PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()&amp;#34;)
delegates the bridge device&amp;#39;s pci_dev_trylock() to pci_bus_trylock() in
pci_slot_trylock(), but it forgets to remove the corresponding
pci_dev_unlock() when pci_bus_trylock() fails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before a4e772898f8b, the code did:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (!pci_dev_trylock(dev)) /* &amp;lt;- lock bridge device */
    goto unlock;
  if (dev-&amp;gt;subordinate) {
    if (!pci_bus_trylock(dev-&amp;gt;subordinate)) {
      pci_dev_unlock(dev);   /* &amp;lt;- unlock bridge device */
      goto unlock;
    }
  }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a4e772898f8b the bridge-device lock is no longer taken, but the
pci_dev_unlock(dev) on the failure path was left in place, leading to the
bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This yields one of two errors:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. A warning that the lock is being unlocked when no one holds it.
  2. An incorrect unlock of a lock that belongs to another thread.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by removing the now-redundant pci_dev_unlock(dev) on the failure
path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Same patch later posted by Keith at
https://patch.msgid.link/20260116184150.3013258-1-kbusch@meta.com]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
