<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 19:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-45919 — sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45919</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound
RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from
RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with
HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution
of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0,
if next_task-&amp;gt;prio &amp;lt; rq-&amp;gt;donor-&amp;gt;prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED
and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu().
Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should
ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments
rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop_next. Even when rd-&amp;gt;rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between
rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop and rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its
search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory
&amp;amp;&amp;amp; rt_nr_total &amp;gt; 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to
itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and
other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop,
which triggers a CPU hardlockup due to continuous self-interrupts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trigging scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0                      cpu1                    cpu2
                                pull_rt_task
                              tell_cpu_to_push…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound
RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from
RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with
HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution
of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0,
if next_task-&amp;gt;prio &amp;lt; rq-&amp;gt;donor-&amp;gt;prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED
and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu().
Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should
ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments
rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop_next. Even when rd-&amp;gt;rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between
rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop and rd-&amp;gt;rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its
search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory
&amp;amp;&amp;amp; rt_nr_total &amp;gt; 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to
itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and
other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop,
which triggers a CPU hardlockup due to continuous self-interrupts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trigging scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpu0                      cpu1                    cpu2
                                pull_rt_task
                              tell_cpu_to_push…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
