<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-45920 — ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45920</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in
ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an
s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a
spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing
of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting
output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path
between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller
ext4_mb_new_blocks().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so
produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the
problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from
ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point,
so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error
bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former
decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to
ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar-&amp;gt;len out path
which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating
the inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster
reservation in this codepath, lift the counter…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in
ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an
s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a
spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing
of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting
output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path
between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller
ext4_mb_new_blocks().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so
produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the
problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from
ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point,
so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error
bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former
decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to
ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar-&amp;gt;len out path
which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating
the inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster
reservation in this codepath, lift the counter…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
